The role of exercise testing in predicting successful ambulation with a lower extremity prosthesis: a systematic literature review and clinical practice guideline

Table 2 Study data

Author	Journal	Year	Study Design	Amputation Level	Exercise Testing Modality	%VO_2max	Maximum workload (W)	Attrition rate
Chin et al.	J Rehabil Res Dev	2012	Prospective Cohort	Hip Disarticulation	1-leg ergometer	57.2 ± 11.1%		0%
Chin et al.	Am J Phys Med Rehabil	2002	Prospective Cohort	Lower Extremity	1-leg ergometer	80.00%	67.6 + 20.2 W	0%
Chin et al.	Am J Phys Med Rehabil	2006	Prospective Cohort	Transfemoral/Hip Disarticulation	1-leg ergometer	64.4 ± 14.4%	X	0%
Chin et al.	Prosthet Orthot Int	2002	Retrospective Cohort	Transfemoral	1-leg ergometer	58.6 ± 7.6%	X	0%
Erjavec et al.	Disabil Rehabil	2014	Prospective Cohort	Unilateral Transfemoral	Upper Extremity	X	50 W	37%
Erjavec et al.	Eur J Phys Med Rehabil	2008	Prospective Cohort	Transfemoral	Upper Extremity	X	40 W	1%
Hamamura, et al.	J Int Med Res	2009	Retrospective Cohort	History of TFA or HD	1-leg ergometer	58.80%	X	X
Vestering, et al.	Int J Rehabil Res	2005	Case Series	Unilateral Lower Extremity	combined upper/lower extremity ergometer	63.69% (combined), 73.3% (UE)	95 W (combined), 106.7 W (UE)	20%
Wezenburg et al.	Ann Phys Med Rehabil	2012	Retrospective Cohort	Transtibial, transfemoral	1-leg cycle ergometer	X	132.0 W peak	3%
Van Velzen et al.	Disabi Rehabil	2006	Systematic Review	Lower Extremity	Rowing machine, UE ergometer	X	Level 2: 44 + 3 W, Level 3: 71 + 4 W	N/A

ISSN: 1743-0003